ANY CARBON BUDGET CAN BE PROGRAMMED INTO CBAT -
Any Carbon Budgets can be programmed via xml into CBAT.
Here, in various sets of THREE [LOW; MEDIUM; HIGH] is a selection of Carbon Budgets
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[1] CBAT Basic 140 Gt C [LOW]; UKCA 395 Gt C [MEDIUM]; BETTS 593 Gt C [HIGH];
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[2] Hansen 171 Gt C [LOW]; IGBP 250 Gt C [MEDIUM]; UKCA 395 Gt C [HIGH];
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[3] IGBP 250 Gt C [LOW]; IGBP 250 Gt C [MEDIUM]; IGBP 250 Gt C [HIGH];
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[4] Betts 140 Gt C [LOW]; McKibben 154 Gt C [MEDIUM]; Hansen 171 Gt C [HIGH];
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[5] Hansen 171 Gt C [LOW]; IGBP 250 Gt C [MEDIUM]; Hansen 674 Gt C [HIGH];
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[6] Betts 140 Gt C [LOW]; IGBP 250 Gt C [MEDIUM]; Betts 410 Gt C [HIGH];
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[7] RCP 3, 380 Gt C [LOW]; RCP 6, 1,375 Gt C [MEDIUM]; RCP, 8.5 2,292 Gt C [HIGH];
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[8] Wasdell -388 Gt C [LOW]; Hansen 1 171 Gt C [MEDIUM]; Hansen 2 674 Gt C [HIGH]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[9] Hansen 349 Gt C [LOW]; Hansen 697 Gt C [MEDIUM]; Hansen 548 Gt C [HIGH]
Note: - The Hansen 'Plos paper' without declaring it, takes up lower emissions output figures for
2010 resulting in this analysis and "Five Questions for J Hansen re 'PLOS' & different messages to the USA and to China."
[9a] Hansen 171 Gt C [LOW]; Hansen 265 Gt C [MEDIUM]; Hansen 529 Gt C [HIGH]
[9b] Hansen 171 Gt C [LOW]; Hansen 265 Gt C [MEDIUM]; Hansen 529 Gt C [HIGH]
showing that his climate-model obviously ignores positive feedback effects.
Switch the UKCA switch to 'ON' [ignore labels] & choose 'Segregated Feedback' for LOW MEDIUM & HIGH.
Then compare his atmospheric CO2 concentration curves with the CBAT concentration curves.
There are three of his [one for LOW, one for MEDIUM & one for HIGH].
Each
of these show truly massive deceleration,
with the potentially massive acceleration of these curves
[CBAT LOW, MEDIUM & HIGH]
as warming increases and releases feedback emissions at an accelerating rate.
The difference is strikingly obvious and shows that Hansen's model obviously ignores and omits all consideration of positive feedback effects [particularly the melt-rate of Arctic Permafrost, about which he is so vocal].
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
